https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Michael Duggan from comment #15) > Would it be possible for one of these to make it into version 15? I'd prefer the change that teaches gcov about coroutines, I fear the change to the status of the coroutine helpers will bring other problems. Having said this having to match the name seems somewhat heavy. If you have access to the function decl, then you should just be able to check the relevant flags (but IDK if the decl is available at that point). Since this is not strictly a regression it's not really eligible for stage #4 (although there are some dispensations for wrong-code, and things that never worked - being treated as regressions). However, if it is not posted it won't be considered - and the maintainer(s) might decide it's low enough risk to apply. 1. You need to post the proposed patch to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org. 2. You need to use a DSO unless you have FSF (C) assignment in place (see https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) 3. Please CC ja...@redhat.com (and me, although I cannot approve it)
