https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118916
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is no ignoring volatile here since the exact memory locations are
written.
Rather you have a memory location which needs to be written using an exact
instruction which has no post increment.
Thus would mean the definition of __raw_writel is incorrect and you have to use
inline-asm to not get the increment for the address.
