https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85824
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > We should also consider only caching chars in the range 0-127, because > otherwise as this bug shows we call transform_primary for 128 char values > which always fail. Which I suppose is similar to Tim's enum { MATCHED, NOT_MATCHED, NOT_CACHED } suggestion, but without storing an enum and just treating everything above 127 as not cached.