https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118112
--- Comment #8 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #7) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) > > So far, I have: > * PR117865 (too many args) > * PR117629 (bool, but as I mentioned on ML, we may want to add treatment for > 'static_assert', 'unreachable', etc too) > * PR117866 (unfortunate fallout of tag rule changes) > > There is https://bugs.gentoo.org/946523 too which might be an extension of > "too many args" or maybe I should file it separately? Another one: * PR116871 (incompatible ptr types message could be clearer on where the mismatch is, this comes up more with () vs (void) again)
