https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118112
--- Comment #7 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) So far, I have: * PR117865 (too many args) * PR117629 (bool, but as I mentioned on ML, we may want to add treatment for 'static_assert', 'unreachable', etc too) * PR117866 (unfortunate fallout of tag rule changes) There is https://bugs.gentoo.org/946523 too which might be an extension of "too many args" or maybe I should file it separately?
