https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108236
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Keywords| |wrong-code Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I see what the problem is (I think I remember having exactly teh same bug when I first implemented the non-parallel version of this algo).