https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115751
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #4) > Created attachment 58567 [details] > proposed patch > > Here's my proposed patch. LGTM but I wonder if x86 general_operand should instead support those in-place duplicate of MEMs? But maybe that would have massive fallout.