https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115751

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #4)
> Created attachment 58567 [details]
> proposed patch
> 
> Here's my proposed patch.

LGTM but I wonder if x86 general_operand should instead support those
in-place duplicate of MEMs?  But maybe that would have massive fallout.

Reply via email to