https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #11) [...] >> * sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu (again, c and c++ only): there are testsuite >> failures all over the place, but I'd have to perform another bootstrap >> with your patches removed to make an exact comparison. > > Hm, the part where you compare results against a baseline is pretty central. > > One the one hand, when it doesn't manifest for sparc64-solaris just through > the > testsuite, the odds are against it manifesting that simple for sparc64-linux. > On the other hand, an existing reproducer is so much easier to handle. Thank > you and thanks in advance for the last step! I've completed the sparc64-linux comparison now: no regressions with a non-bootstrap build and your patches either, thus the same situation as on Solaris.
