https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > > I've pushed a fix for PR115137, it's likely this fixes also this bug. > > unfortunately, not; at least, on my fastest x86 machine (AVX512) - the fail > is the same (different CSWTCH.xxx numbers between the stage1 compiler and > the stage2 - the numbers are unchanged with the r15-753 [.154 and .155 > respectively]). Note stage1 and stage2 are not expected to compare equal - it's stage2 and stage3 objects that are compared. > I don't expect the machine to make any difference - and I saw that this was > also reported by at least one person for Linux too (although bootstrapping > with O3, I think). I think that was an ICE with prange.
