https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |arm-linux-gnueabihf
Component|target |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>From testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h:
```
{
/* On some processors without NEON support, this instruction may
be a no-op, on others it may trap, so check that it executes
correctly. */
long long a = 0, b = 1;
asm ("vorr %P0, %P1, %P2"
: "=w" (a)
: "0" (a), "w" (b));
if (a != 1)
exit (0);
}
```
Hmm, what is the correct way of testing this here?
Also the other thing is maybe:
/* { dg-do run } */
Should be removed ...
The testcases in vect default to run if it is on HW that supports the SIMD
registers; otherwise it defaults to compile.
The only cases where specifying run is needed is if dg-additional-sources is
used.
Anyways this is a still a testsuite issue either way.