https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |arm-linux-gnueabihf Component|target |testsuite --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >From testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h: ``` { /* On some processors without NEON support, this instruction may be a no-op, on others it may trap, so check that it executes correctly. */ long long a = 0, b = 1; asm ("vorr %P0, %P1, %P2" : "=w" (a) : "0" (a), "w" (b)); if (a != 1) exit (0); } ``` Hmm, what is the correct way of testing this here? Also the other thing is maybe: /* { dg-do run } */ Should be removed ... The testcases in vect default to run if it is on HW that supports the SIMD registers; otherwise it defaults to compile. The only cases where specifying run is needed is if dg-additional-sources is used. Anyways this is a still a testsuite issue either way.