https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note that it's clear from the .syntax markers that this is inline assembler that's the source of the invalid instructions.
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:35:24 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note that it's clear from the .syntax markers that this is inline assembler that's the source of the invalid instructions.