[Bug c++/113308] derived class doesn't currently allow inherited explicit object member function post increment operator

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113308

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, I think gcc is correct here. Explicit object functions aren't immune to
name hiding.