https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112962

--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> I was thinking whether it wouldn't be better to expand x86 const or pure
> builtins when lhs is ignored to nothing in the expanders.

Yes, this could be a better solution.

Reply via email to