https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112962
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I was thinking whether it wouldn't be better to expand x86 const or pure > builtins when lhs is ignored to nothing in the expanders. Yes, this could be a better solution.