https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112962
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I was thinking whether it wouldn't be better to expand x86 const or pure builtins when lhs is ignored to nothing in the expanders.