https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112480

--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<r...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:866870c51d58881819db6db76dcdfe3f43d89903

commit r13-8132-g866870c51d58881819db6db76dcdfe3f43d89903
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Nov 11 00:35:18 2023 +0000

    libstdc++: Micro-optimization for std::optional [PR112480]

    This small change removes a branch when clearing a std::optional<T> for
    types with no-op destructors. For types where the destructor can be
    optimized away (e.g. because it's trivial, or empty and can be inlined)
    the _M_destroy() function does nothing but set _M_engaged to false.
    Setting _M_engaged=false unconditionally is cheaper than only doing it
    when initially true, because it allows the compiler to remove a branch.

    The compiler thinks it would be incorrect to unconditionally introduce a
    store there, because it could conflict with reads in other threads, so
    it won't do that optimization itself. We know it's safe to do because
    we're in a non-const member function, so the standard forbids any
    potentially concurrent calls to other member functions of the same
    object. Making the store unconditional can't create a data race that
    isn't already present in the program.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/112480
            * include/std/optional (_Optional_payload_base::_M_reset): Set
            _M_engaged to false unconditionally.

    (cherry picked from commit 2c492f99fc1fcb5f598286c3f3a21a05bca69d9e)
  • [Bug libstdc++/112480] optional... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to