https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111720
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I noticed there is an ABI difference here.
>
> GCC is returning via a store to a0:
> vsm.v v1,0(a0)
>
> While LLVM is returning via v0 .
>
> Which one is correct?
Both are correct. We have a experiment ABI doc.
GCC also support same ABI but need --param=riscv-vector-abi
Then GCC ASM:
fn:
lui a5,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
addi sp,sp,-32
addi a5,a5,%lo(.LANCHOR0)
vsetivli zero,4,e64,m2,ta,ma
li a4,32
vle64.v v8,0(a5)
vse64.v v8,0(sp)
vsetvli zero,a4,e8,m1,ta,ma
vle8.v v0,0(sp)
vand.vi v0,v0,1
addi sp,sp,32
jr ra
GCC also return via v0 with enabling ABI.
The root cause is unnecessary load/store:
vle64.v v8,0(a5)
vse64.v v8,0(sp)
