https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110634
--- Comment #2 from Björn Töpel <bjorn at kernel dot org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I don't see where in any of the spec mentioned that storing of ra is needed > at all. That is it does not read ambigous to me at all. It just mentions for > a frame pointer, the frame pointer needs to be saved and nothing about ra. > > This is totally different from the power ABI. Hmm, but is a frame-pointer w/o the ability to unwind useful? Or am I missing something?
