https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109989
--- Comment #4 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I left some cruft in that reproducer, it should have been
volatile float f[2];
int x[2];
void func() {
x[0] = -1;
x[1] = 2;
for (int i = 0; i < 1; ++i)
f[i] = x[i];
}
Not sure what's going on yet, but nothing jumps out in that bisected patch.
I'm guessing we've just got something wrong with poly/scalar conversion,
there's a bunch of implicit assumptions based around si/di conversions in our
backend and I bet we're violating something there. That's all been a sticking
point for a while and I think some of the Ventana guys were looking into
cleaning it up, maybe Jeff has a better idea?
