https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100080

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed.  At -O2 combine manages to drop the call to foo () (indirectly),
> at -O3 it does not.  There's not much difference on the GIMPLE level

For the gimple level it comes down to:
  _5 = (unsigned int) l_20(D);
  if (_5 > 1)
    goto <bb 5>; [50.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 6>; [50.00%]

What should we do there, l_20(D) is definitely uninitialized?
We even get a warning about it:

In function 'e',
    inlined from 'main' at <source>:17:5:
<source>:9:20: warning: 'l' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
    9 |   d = c >= (*j = b | *k) && b & (*i == 0);
      |                  ~~^~~~
<source>: In function 'main':
<source>:16:9: note: 'l' was declared here
   16 |     int l;
      |         ^

Reply via email to