https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84201

--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> One option is to introduce a less invasive optimization option[...]

I think that would be useful, yes.  It could even be a param if we do not want
to commit to having it forever.

Reply via email to