https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to sandra from comment #4) > The proposed fix in comment 2 looks OK to me, although I'd like to see a > comment here like > > "This case corresponds to an assumed-rank actual passed to a function > without an explicit interface, which is diagnosed in gfc_procedure_use." > > to explain what is going on. I no longer commit patches. Feel free to do whatever you want here; although, I think the comment is unwarranted.