https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103193
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- Converting from >= to == is inappropriate (because >= should raise invalid for all NaN operands but == should do so only for signaling NaNs). If that's happening in architecture-independent code, then this is an architecture-independent bug.
