https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100328
--- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7) > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #6) > > Created attachment 51066 [details] > > aarch64 XPASS failure list > > > > The patch v3 bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-redhat-linux and > > powerpc64le-linux-gnu, but still have some "XFAIL -> XPASS" regression > > failures on aarch64-linux-gnu, I think these remaining failures are expected > > (assembly gets improved). Need Richard's help to double check/confirm them. > Nice! Yeah, these are all progressions rather than regressions. > > The scan-assemblers in gcc.target/sve/acle check for the preferred output. > We don't always get there yet, so some of them have been XFAILed. But for > this part of the testsuite all XFAILs->XPASSes are improvements. Thanks for your time, Richard! I'll make a patch to fix these expected test case changes.
