https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99105

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|profile streaming scales    |[11 regression] profile
                   |poorly to projects with     |streaming scales poorly to
                   |many source files           |projects with many source
                   |                            |files

--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With GCC10 the testuiste seems to run reasonably fast (in about 20 minutes
too).  Profile is
  21.38%  clang-11                                         [.] gcov_do_dump     
   9.99%  clang-11                                         [.] gcov_read_words  
   5.42%  [kernel]                                         [k]
copy_user_enhanced_fast_string                                                  
   2.68%  FileCheck                                        [.] lstep            
   2.63%  [kernel]                                         [k] clear_page_erms  
   2.53%  clang-11                                         [.] __gcov_merge_add 
   2.23%  clang-11                                         [.] gcov_write_words 
   1.93%  clang-11                                         [.]
__gcov_read_counter                                                             
   1.50%  clang-11                                         [.]
__gcov_merge_topn                                                               
   1.29%  [kernel]                                         [k]
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath                                                
   1.26%  [kernel]                                         [k] alloc_set_pte    
   1.20%  [kernel]                                         [k]
__x86_indirect_thunk_rax                                                        
   1.05%  FileCheck                                        [.] sstep            
   0.79%  [kernel]                                         [k] _raw_spin_lock   
   0.78%  [kernel]                                         [k] kmem_cache_free  
   0.78%  [kernel]                                         [k]
generic_file_buffered_read                                                      
   0.72%  [kernel]                                         [k] kmem_cache_alloc 
   0.69%  [kernel]                                         [k] kfree            
   0.64%  [kernel]                                         [k] page_remove_rmap 
   0.63%  [kernel]                                         [k]
filemap_map_pages                                                               
   0.60%  [kernel]                                         [k] __slab_free      
   0.55%  [kernel]                                         [k] handle_mm_fault

So I am marking this a regression at least until we analyze it better.

Reply via email to