https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920
--- Comment #9 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Even if it does, exporting regexec@@GLIBC_2.3.4 from libsanitizer when glibc > doesn't support that symbol looks wrong. I think all the interceptors use unversioned symbols, so this doesn't matter. Yes, it's quite broken, but when fixing this, you might as well go with the flow …
