https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Hi Martin, My sincere apologies for the delay in replying and also for > uploading a faulty patch. I have attached another patch for this issue. It > is more of a tweak than a straight-forward approach to fixing the issue. > Kindly let me know if this is ok or if any modifications are required. > It has been tested for regressions on trunk and no failures have been found. Hello. I don't like the patch as it's a special case for one particular function. Is the issue really so problematic?
