https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #56 from jiawei <jiawei at iscas dot ac.cn> ---
Hi Kito,
I test the performance data on qemu-riscv64, and compile the benchmark
with riscv-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -Os.
All the modify is set in /coremark-pro/util/make/
to change the toolchain and run env.
I am also insterested about which part has changed due to the patch. I
will try to find out the different.在 2020年12月21日 下午11:38，"kito at gcc
dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>写道：
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #55 from Kito Cheng <kito at gcc dot gnu.org[1]> ---
Hi jiawei:
Thanks for the data, the performance changing for coremark-pro
seems
interesting, could you find which part generate different code
after the patch?
And I am curious what the platform you used for the performance
data?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1. http://gnu.org
