https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #53 from jiawei <jiawei at iscas dot ac.cn> ---
Hi Jim,
Levy had asked me to help about the test. I was resigned on EEMBC and
waiting acess for more benchmarks. Now I am testing on csibe and
coremax-pro. I think will lineout the result in this week.If it need
test on more set. Just mail me about it.
Best wishes,
Jiawei
在 2020年12月18日 上午2:13，"wilson at gcc dot gnu.org"
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>写道：
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #52 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org[1]> ---
I did some simple testing of my patch alone. I modified the
riscv-gnu-toolchain makefile to use -Os to build all libraries,
built a
rv32imac/ilp32 toolchain, and looked at library code size. I see a
few cases
where my patch gives smaller code, and no obvious cases where it
gives larger
code, so I think it is OK.
I haven't tried a full test with my patch combined with Levy's
patch minus the
combine change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1. http://gnu.org
