https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97713
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > > Now, should objcopy implement the relocation? > > Nick proposed a patch that errors out on current gcc output. > > > Note that llvm emits a '0' as abbrev offset instead of a label. > > And gcc would have to emit a 0, like llvm. It that ok from gcc perspective? Ping.
