https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
After
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2020-November/336787.html
the simplified test case seems to be fixed.
What I now get with the original test case is
Decomposition information on image 4 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 21 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 6 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 23 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 2 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 23 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 8 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 21 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 5 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 23 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 1 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 23 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 7 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 23 grid cells.
Decomposition information on image 3 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on
this image has 45 * 23 grid cells.
Size mismatch for coarray allocation id 0x608460: found = 30240 != size = 33120
where the error message seems to be correct; I think all coarrays
on different images must have the same size.
Toon, could you maybe comment?
