https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94960
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |missed-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please provide complete testcases, not just URLs, as required by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs
#include <string>
int main()
{
std::string(size_t(0), 0);
}
I still think it's wrong for GCC to treat the 'inline' specifier as an inlining
hint. The compiler should be a better judge of inlining decisions than the
developer.
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> g:1a289fa36294627c252492e4c18d7877a7c80dc1 changed that.
Well that commit just meant that the explicit instantiations are declared for
C++17 as well, where previously they were only declared for < C++17. It didn't
add the explicit instantiations.
