https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94168
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > I read Josephs comment so that GCC is correct to reject the code and Martins > quoting of the original testcase shows it's likely a genuine bug in the > program (a typo of some sorts). Yes. A real one bug that was already fixed.
