https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #7 from Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6) > Well, zero-length arrays are a GNU C extension, but pre-C99 you could use > pixels[1] and post-C99 you can use pixels[]. Is non of that an option? The code could be changed, sure. We hit this _only_ on s390x when rebuilding libXt. If the code is invalid then why the inconsistency?
