https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It seems like the reporter might be conflating the forming of a past-the-end
pointer (what the GRABEXT macro does) with dereferencing that pointer (the use
of the -> operator with the result).

This would be valid:

  void *p = GRABEXT (&e);

The test case in comment #0 is not because it accesses the object at that
address (past the end of e).

Reply via email to