https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |87403
Summary|missing warnings for |missing warnings for
|unreachable codes with |unreachable codes with
|-Wunreachable-code |break (i.e. revive the
| |subset of
| |-Wunreachable-code that
| |fits under clang's
| |-Wunreachable-code-break)
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5)
> This should be suspended until someone comes up with a proposal for reviving
> -Wunreachable that is supported by GCC developers. Having bugs lying around
> in UNCONFIRMED or NEW may give the impression that a quick-and-dirty
> solution may be acceptable, which is not the case. Any proposed solution
> must solve the problems that led to the removal of the previous
> -Wunreachable-code.
I think this specific bug is just about adding the -Wunreachable-code-break
sub-obtion of -Wunreachable-code; not reviving -Wunreachable-code as a whole.
Retitling to clarify that this would be a new flag
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
[Bug 87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning
