https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91227
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #19) > That's a valid concern. Issuing a warning (either at the same time as or in > lieu of the folding) would be a way to detect and prevent these kinds of > problems. Exposing it to enough code (like in a whole distro rebuild) would > give us a pretty good idea about what the appropriate defaults ought to be. How exactly is this different from the warning discussed in bug 81453? It seems awfully similar to me...
