https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92127
Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I suggest to make the test less dependent on unrolling by placing
>
> #pragma GCC unroll 0
>
> before the inner loop which is likely unrolled now. I wonder whether
> the test tests profitability of outer loop vectorization (likely
> not profitable)? I see rs6000 adjusts unroll parameters as well.
Confirmed that the inner loop is completely unrolled after the suspected
commit. I checked the dump details, the test is to test the inner loop
profitable or not, the outer loop vectorization fail far ahead of profit
determination.
/home/linkw/gcc/gcc-git-base/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c:18:20:
missed: versioning for alias required: can't determine dependence between *_7
and *_11
consider run-time aliasing test between *_7 and *_11
/home/linkw/gcc/gcc-git-base/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c:18:20:
missed: runtime alias check not supported for outer loop.
/home/linkw/gcc/gcc-git-base/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c:13:4:
missed: bad data dependence.
/home/linkw/gcc/gcc-git-base/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c:13:4:
missed: couldn't vectorize loop
