https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
--- Comment #59 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #58) > If we don't want to go with #c35 at least for GCC 9, would the #c44 patch be > still useful without it (does it ever trigger say on the kernel where it > didn't trigger before)? The patch in comment 44 is obviously good, it improves the size by 0.090% as noted (this is a kernel build, multi_v5_defconfig iirc). I'd say it is perfectly safe for GCC 9, but I'm not an Arm maintainer :-)
