https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #4) > I don't agree that the code submitted in this bug report is non-sensical. > The submitted example is very useful for code debugging purposes. I just > spent a couple of hours trying to isolate this same bug. Being able to > print output for a type with no components would have saved me the all the > time that led to finding this bug report. > Ah! We often don't see the importance of emptyness, or the 'null' case so to speak. That does make sense to me. How does this fall out w.r.t the Fortran Standard. Is it explicitly required, processor defined, or our own extension?
