https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:33:52PM +0000, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678 > > --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10) > > Can someone please test the patch in Comment #9 on powerpc? It should fix > > all failures, modulo ieee_10.f90 which is fixed by [1]. > > > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg01685.html > > I did a bootstrap and regtest of the attached patch using revision 268398 > which > includes your patch [1]. The patch showed no regressions and fixed all of the > ieee_*.f90 and large_1.f90 tests, so I think this patch is good to go for > powerpc*-linux. > > The large_2.f90 failure I mentioned earlier is not caused by this patch, but > maybe due to [1] or some other earlier patch. I will track that down. > Peter, thanks for checking Uros' patches. Uros the patches are OK to commit. PS: Yes, my xterm suppressed the last character of your name.
