https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
--- Comment #23 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22) > (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #21) > > Since -Wjump-misses-init triggers too often for commonly used C patterns, > > I do not think it is appropriate to include it in -Wall. > > OK, so what about -Wextra then? My personal feeling as a user is that clang's warning is useful enough that if GCC were to implement that, that one could be included in -Wall. It avoids warning for the common cases where code works as intended, and still manages to warn for the OP's code. I do not know how much work it would be to implement that; if it would be too much work, then including -Wjump-misses-init in -Wextra makes sense to me.
