https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88810
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Paul
>
> 'svn blame' points a finger at you with r212486.
> Does this section of code ring a bell.
I'm I reading r212486 correctly, the previous version of the code already had a
duplicated condition: both copies of the duplicated condition were updated in
r212486 from:
if (reverse && reverse[n] == GFC_ENABLE_REVERSE)
to:
if (reverse && reverse[m] == GFC_ENABLE_REVERSE)
I *think* the duplicated condition was introduced by r174302 (but I'm no expert
on this code).
