https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88648
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2019-01-08
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work| |5.4.1
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
Summary|Force unified syntax for |[7/8/9 Regression] Force
|inline assembly not |unified syntax for inline
|functional |assembly not functional
|(-masm-syntax-unified) |(-masm-syntax-unified)
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |6.5.0, 7.4.1, 8.2.1, 9.0
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed on all the branches since GCC 6. GCC 5 did the right thing.
I think r222995 is to blame
