https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I recommend that on balance for all targets the current behavior is a > reasonable compromise. I have said elsewhere that I am happy to continue > working in this area and would welcome any further help to evaluate the > effects of further work. EricB has offered his assistance and any additional > help would also be good as this issue affects targets in different ways. Yes, I don't think that we want to revert r245655 now, since it is necessary for MIPS and doesn't really hurt ARM. Its only effect is to widen some subword loads to word loads, which shouldn't really matter in most cases.
