https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ok, same reason but my "simple" two-predecessor "hack" doesn't get it because we now have three...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ok, same reason but my "simple" two-predecessor "hack" doesn't get it because we now have three...