https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #36 from Mark Wielaard <mark at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #33) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #32) > > - PR70517 > > _ZSt4moveIRZN11tconcurrent6futureIvE4thenIZ5awaitIS2_EDaOT_EUlRKS6_E_EENS1_IN > > St5decayIDTclfp_defpTEEE4typeEEES7_EUlvE_EONSt16remove_referenceIS6_E4typeES7 > > _ > > This one demangles just fine with Nathan's patch. > > > > > - PR68700 > > _ZN8futurizeI13frozen_schemaE5applyIRZN7seastar7shardedIN7service13storage_pr > > oxyEE9invoke_onIZZNS6_22init_messaging_serviceEvENKUljN5utils4UUIDEE8_clEjSA_ > > EUlOT_E_6futureIJS0_EEEET0_jSD_EUlvE_JEEESG_SD_DpOT0_ > > This looks like it comes from a real compiler, dunno what it should demangle > > to. > > This one, too. You are right. Sorry our messages/investigations crossed. If I allow d_printing up to 2 levels they do (with Nathan's patch). > > - PR61460 > > _ZNK6clover6detail11basic_rangeINS_13adaptor_rangeINS_9addressesEINS2_IRFRNS_ > > 5eventEP9_cl_eventEINS_14iterator_rangeIPKS7_EEEEEEEENS0_16iterator_adaptorIS > > 3_INSG_IS9_ISC_EEEEEESI_EcvT_ISt6vectorIPS4_SaISN_EEvEEv > > The referenced GDB bug claims this comes from clover's libOpenCL in Mesa, > > but doesn't state which compiler. > > None of the three demanglers could handle this one. Does any of them handle the one from PR67738: _ZNK6Common15ConvertingRangeIN5boost12range_detail17transformed_rangeIZN1a1b1cEbEUljE_KSt6vectorIjSaIjEEEEEcvT_IS7_INS4_1dESaISF_EEEEv
