https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67807
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The testcase doesn't show any problem, and nothing fails as claimed.
The return value 1 does not mean opening the catalog failed, it is not an error
code, it's a handle for a catalog. After calling do_open() twice you have two
different handles (which happen to refer to the same catalog, but that's beside
the point).
The behaviour you see is conforming, and not a bug.
