https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #21) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20) > > > Do I understand the patch correctly that it requires > > > "-fprofile-update=atomic" option in order to eliminate this bug? > > > > Exactly, I hope I'll be able to merge the whole patchset (5) to mainline > > soon. > > What's the rationale behind this decision? This looks a bit counter > intuitive and counter productive. People just enable profiling and don't > think twice about extra requirements it might ensue. Sure, as Nathan suggested, we'll select the proper default value according to -pthread argument.
