https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306

--- Comment #21 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem at mailcity dot com> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> > Do I understand the patch correctly that it requires
> > "-fprofile-update=atomic" option in order to eliminate this bug?
> 
> Exactly, I hope I'll be able to merge the whole patchset (5) to mainline
> soon.

What's the rationale behind this decision? This looks a bit counter intuitive
and counter productive. People just enable profiling and don't think twice
about extra requirements it might ensue.

Reply via email to