https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66780

--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2)
> Could this also be the cause for PR66312 and PR66563 after all? 

My 2 cents.

I've just revert the problematic part on trunk after usual test.
I'll revert it on 4.9 when the usual test is done and to 5 when
the branch reopens.

Reply via email to